Hello Week #3 of Photography Tip Tuesdays!

This month we’re examining two snapshot portraits, and why one works, and the other doesn’t. Photography Tip #1 is here, Photography Tip #2 is here.

This is our bad photo:

bad portrait

And here is our good photo:

portrait of photographer

Simple Tip: It’s called “portrait” orientation for a good reason

When you want to print a sheet of paper the hotdog way, you select “portrait.” When you want to print it the hamburger way, you select “landscape.” It’s right there in the name, yet the vast majority of snapshots of people are horizontal prints (probably because it’s easier to hold the camera that way).

A very easy way to improve most of your compositions is to turn the camera, remembering that “portrait orientation is for people, landscape is for landscapes.”

People are tall and skinny, and so they fill the frame better when the photo is vertical. In the bad photo, Nic doesn’t fill the picture. He is the subject, but he’s swimming around with a bunch of clutter. In the good photo, Nic fills the frame.

Stepping it Up: All rules were meant to be broken

Finding ways to break this rule can lead to very interesting compositions. Most of the time landscape orientation portraits are showing a beautiful landscape, like this engagement portrait:

engagement portrait colorado

Close-ups can be very interesting, though, too, because it usually leads to cropping the face in an unexpected way:

toddler portrait

If you’re going to use a horizontal orientation, though, it’s important to remember to watch your composition. You most likely will be creating some white space, so you’ll want to make sure that space really is white (and not full of a lamp or china cabinet as in The Bad Photo) and that you utilize the rule of thirds to keep things interesting. (More of the rule of thirds next week for our “simple photography tip.”)

Posted in Photographer Tips

 

I realize that it is neither Photography Tip Tuesday nor Photoshop Friday, but I would like to talk today about how to keep your digital files from consuming you, your home, your life, and your sanity (because I’m procrastinating from going through my own photos).

Oh, your pictures want to take over your life. It starts off so simply. You buy a digital camera, you fire off some shots, you download them to your computer. You look at them, you may delete the obviously horribly bad ones, but you save the rest. You can’t possibly delete them–they are photos.

And then it gets worse. You discover “burst” mode and have a baby–all at the same time. Suddenly you’re taking 400 pictures a day and you certainly can’t delete any now because they are of your precious baby, and that is the only photo you have of that precious baby from April 3rd at 3:30pm and 35.28 seconds (you also have one from April 3rd at 3:30pm and 35.29 seconds as well as 35.27 seconds).

And you do this day after day and week after week and month after month…and then you discover the joys of shooting RAW files instead of jpegs. And instead of immediately converting them into jpegs and tossing the RAW files, you can’t possibly part with the RAW files. What if you need to make adjustments later on?

And this goes on for a year or two or three until your home server is bursting at the seams and you are forced to constantly delete a little of this and a little of that just to squeeze one more thing on to it.

And yes, you could certainly buy a bigger home server, but sanity needs to play a part here, too. How many photos does one really need of their own life? I have maybe 350 pictures of my entire childhood. Will has 350 pictures in a folder labeled 14 March 2006. And this folder isn’t alone. It’s not even sort of unique.

How does one manage their digital photos without resorting to purchasing a storage unit for their 1000s of external drives? How does one protect their photos from computer malfunction? And how does one organize their photos so that they can be found amongst the hundreds of thousands?

I have done very well with two of these questions, and failed miserably with one. I’m working on the one this week, and thought it might be helpful to share my workflow with others lest you make the same mistake (or make an even worse mistake and don’t back up your pictures…).

In my experience, there are three important aspects to storing your family’s digital photo snapshots:

1) Editing

2) Organization

3) Back-up
1. Editing
In the past, I wasn’t so good about the editing. I kept almost everything. And a lot of that almost everything is totally unnecessary. I don’t need 35 pictures of Will laying on a blanket with ever-so-slightly different expressions. One, two, or MAYBE three is enough. In the last couple of months, I have been good about deleting the unnecessary pictures the day I upload them. But that still leaves two years of Will photo-mania. So, I have assigned myself a project–every day I’m going through one month of pictures and deleting the ones that really aren’t necessary.

When I’m done, I’ll have a photo library that is actually enjoyable to browse through.

2. Organization

I’m not going to call anyone out, but I have seen some nasty photo organization going on out there in the world. Dumping all of your pictures into the “My Pictures” folder in Windows is a recipe for disaster. Here is the system that I’ve been using since 2002, divided into “b.w.” (before will) and “a.w.” (after Will–when our picture taking went from occasional to hourly).

Before Will:

1. In “My Pictures,” every year gets a folder. Then every event/picture taking reason got a folder within the year. Like 2003>Trip to Disney World or 2005>Ferrets Make Mess in Kitchen. I had 20-40 folders within each year, and it worked well and was easy to browse and easy to manage.

After Will:

2. Suddenly we were taking pictures every day, and 365 folders were not going to be easy to browse, or to manage. So I came up with a new system: every year still had a folder, but within that folder there was a month, and then a day. So it now looked like 2007>January>14 Jan Will and Nic in snow.

3. When I first started Real Photography, my home snapshots dropped dramatically, so I was able to go to just a year>month folder system this past summer, since June only had 30 pictures in it (for example).

Organizing after RAW:

If you shoot in RAW, your pictures are a lot bigger. Odds are good that you won’t ever go back and want to readjust your RAW adjustments, so to save storage space and my sanity, when I download my personal snapshots, I immediately make my adjustments, convert them to jpeg, and delete the RAW file. (This also means that my pictures are ready to be shared online and I can view them in windows photo gallery as opposed to only in bridge.)

Taking Organizing to the Next Level…

By using Bridge or Lightroom, you have lots of options for adding additional organization to your photos. But this post is getting a little long, so we’ll save those tips for later this week.

3. Back-up

You know how in the movies people always lose important files and then the supporting character says “well, didn’t you back it up?” Backing up is like flossing. Everyone knows they should do it, but only the professionals and anal-retentive actually do.

Here’s the deal: if you don’t back-up because it’s a pain in the butt, I hear ya. So you have to build a system that makes it automatic.

For our family photos, we have a simple two back-up system. When I download the files initially, they go to our home server, which has an additional hard drive set up to mirror the first. Without having to click anything or adjust anything, every photo is saved to two hard drives. If one dies, the other will be there.

And in case that doesn’t work out, every month I burn a cd with the past month’s photos. Just once a month. And since the pictures are organized by month, it is super easy to just drag and drop that month folder into Roxio data dvd burner. Voila!

(For our personal snapshots, I don’t back-up as much as we do for our wedding and portrait photographs. If you want to go for the gusto and treat your family pictures like treasures, you need to consider what happens in the event that your house is destroyed and invest in a firesafe box rated for electronic media or look into off-site/online storage, as well as burn two DVDs with the pictures immediately every time you download.)

Posted in Photographer TipsPhotoshop Tips

 

Last week I debuted our new Tuesday feature: (photography) Tip Tuesdays. For the first month we’ll be covering two snapshot portraits and what makes one good and the other bad.

This week? Lighting, part one.

For your viewing pleasure…we have, the bad photo:

bad-portrait.jpg

And the good one:

nic-camping.jpg

The Basics

It’s easy to look at the top photo and see that a flash fired when I used my on-camera flash when I took the picture. The second picture appears to use natural light or at least more skillful flash use (natural light).

The Bad photo has Nic much brighter than his background, with white areas on his forehead and cheek. The flash has cast a shadow on the back wall (we’ll return to this next week) and all in all, it’s not pretty.

One of the most basic pieces of advice when it comes to lighting for snapshots: turn off your flash whenever possible. There are many cameras that fire a flash in almost any indoor setting, and many times it isn’t needed. Turn off your flash and see what happens. Your indoor evening photos will probably look warmer (more yellow/orangey), but that can be welcome, since it is more likely how you remember the scene.

Flash light is harsh and unflattering. When you can control it, it’s better to have more even lighting for your family pictures (near a window, under shade, or outside on a cloudy day).

Step it Up

This is the part where we say that even the good photo sucks a little. The light was even and flattering, but I failed to capture any of it in Nic’s eyes. Great catchlights (the highlights in your subject’s eyes) are at the heart of an engaging portrait. I’ll let adorable Eli from this weekend’s session be my catchlights model:

baby-eyes.jpg

So what could I have done differently in Nic’s picture to put some catchlights in those eyes? I could have turned him in different directions to see what would happen, but on this flat super cloudy day, I would probably have better luck with a reflector. I have a 5-in-1 reflector that I adore. By holding it angled up toward his face, even on a cloudy day I most likely would have been able to shine some light back into his eyes.  (of course, then I would have to contend with glare on his glasses, but it would have been easy enough to ask him to take them off)

As for the lighting on extra adorable Eli, I took his portrait in front of a window. I could have spent all day playing with him and his amazing blue eyes!

Posted in Photographer Tips